Archive for the ‘CamCrawler Mobile’ Category

A approach that is particularly problematic distinguishing people in same-sex relationships may be the usage of proxy reports.

Friday, September 25th, 2020

A approach that is particularly problematic distinguishing people in same-sex relationships may be the usage of proxy reports.

In a few dyadic studies information are gathered from both lovers individually, centering on points of overlap and distinctions between partners’ records, learning such problems as the symbolic concept of appropriate unions for same-sex couples (Reczek, Elliott, & Umberson, 2009; Rothblum et al., 2011b), parenting experiences (Goldberg, Kinkler, Richardson, & Downing, 2011), closeness characteristics (Umberson, Thomeer, & Lodge, in press), interracial relationship characteristics (Steinbugler, 2010), partners’ interactions around health behavior (Reczek & Umberson, 2012), and relationship satisfaction and closeness (Totenhagen et al., 2012). In comparison, other research reports have gathered information from lovers simultaneously, through joint interviews, experiments, or observations that are ethnographic targeting interactions between lovers or lovers’ collective reactions. For instance, researchers used observational ways to offer unique insights into same-sex partners’ conflict styles (Gottman, 1993), unit of household work (Moore, 2008), and coparenting interactions (Farr & Patterson, 2013).

Challenges and methods for studying relationships that are same-Sex

Although present data are seen as a several restrictions, this will be no reason at all in order to prevent the analysis of same-sex relationships. Certainly, it’s important to triangulate a variety of qualitative and quantitative research designs and resources of information in efforts to recognize constant habits in same-sex relationships across studies and also to draw in revolutionary strategies that add to the familiarity with same-sex relationships. (more…)